Abstract
Quantum workloads are increasingly delivered through cloud platforms, yet emerging quantum data centers face a distinctive energy challenge: facility power is often dominated by cryogenic cooling systems and auxiliary infrastructure rather than by compute alone. This study proposes a carbon-aware co-optimization framework for green quantum data centers that jointly integrates deadline-aware workload scheduling with dynamic cooling setpoint control. In contrast to prior studies that typically consider scheduling and thermal management independently largely in classical data-center environments the proposed framework evaluates their combined effects on facility-level energy consumption, operational carbon emissions, and fairness across tenants within an end-to-end simulation tailored to quantum infrastructure, where cooling setpoints strongly influence cryogenic efficiency. A simplified quantum data-center model with temperature-dependent cooling efficiency is developed, together with heterogeneous quantum job arrivals characterized by runtimes, priorities, and deadlines. Time-varying carbon-intensity and ambient-temperature signals are incorporated to emulate renewable-driven grid dynamics. Carbon-aware scheduling supports both flexible and strict deferral policies that shift eligible jobs toward lower-carbon periods while respecting deadline constraints. In parallel, a lightweight model predictive control strategy enumerates feasible cooling setpoint trajectories to minimize predicted facility energy use subject to temperature bounds and ramp-rate limits. Performance is evaluated across multiple random seeds, with uncertainty quantified using confidence intervals and statistical significance assessed via bootstrap testing. Simulation results show that MPC-based cooling control reduces total facility energy consumption by approximately 9% relative to a fixed-setpoint baseline. Carbon-aware job deferrals provide additional emissions reductions ranging from several percent to double-digit values depending on deferral aggressiveness, with explicitly quantified trade-offs in waiting time and SLA violations. Fairness impacts are assessed using Jain’s index, the Gini coefficient, and per-class waiting times. A publicly reproducible implementation is provided to support validation and future extensions to higher-fidelity quantum facility and workload models.
References
Krinner S, Storz S, Kurpiers P, Magnard P, Heinsoo J, Keller R, et al. Engineering cryogenic setups for 100-qubit scale superconducting circuit systems. EPJ Quantum Technol. 2019; 6(1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-019-0072-0
Deng X, Schulz M, Schulz L. Power consumption and energy efficiency of quantum computing platforms in high performance computing integration. In: International Conference on Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics; 2024 Sep 9; Cham. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024. p. 325-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-85700-3_24
Zou Y, Keskin B, Taylor GG, Li Z, Wang J, Alarcon E, et al. Power delivery for cryogenic scalable quantum applications: challenges and opportunities. arXiv:2511.13965 [cs]; 2025 Nov 17.
Xu Y, Tian M, Yan C, Li D, Deng T, Guo P, et al. A data center energy efficiency optimization method based on optimal temperature control of designated active servers. Energy Build. 2025; 345: 116126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116126
Safari A, Sorouri H, Rahimi A, Oshnoei A. A systematic review of energy efficiency metrics for optimizing cloud data center operations and management. Electronics. 2025; 14(11): 2214. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14112214
Li X, Zhang Z, Chen Y, He R. A review on AI-driven optimization of data center energy efficiency and thermal management. Int J Appl Sci. 2025; 8(3): 108. https://doi.org/10.30560/ijas.v8n3p108
Radovanović A, Koningstein R, Schneider I, Chen B, Duarte A, Roy B, et al. Carbon-aware computing for datacenters. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2023; 38(2): 1270-80. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3173250
Bostandoost R, Hanafy WA, Lechowicz A, Bashir N, Shenoy P, Hajiesmaili M. Data-driven algorithm selection for carbon-aware scheduling. ACM SIGENERGY Energy Inform Rev. 2024; 4(5): 148-53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3727200.3727222
Liu W, Yan Y, Sun Y, Mao H, Cheng M, Wang P, et al. Online job scheduling scheme for low-carbon data center operation: an information and energy nexus perspective. Appl Energy. 2023; 338: 120918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120918
Acun B, Lee B, Kazhamiaka F, Maeng K, Gupta U, Chakkaravarthy M, et al. Carbon explorer: a holistic framework for designing carbon-aware datacenters. In: Proc 28th ACM Int Conf Archit Support Program Lang Oper Syst (ASPLOS); 2023 Jan 27. p. 118-32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3575693.3575754
Wiesner P, Behnke I, Kilian P, Steinke M, Kao O. Vessim: a testbed for carbon-aware applications and systems. ACM SIGENERGY Energy Inform Rev. 2024; 4(5): 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1145/3727200.3727210
Maji D, Pfaff B, PR V, Sreenivasan R, Firoiu V, Iyer S, et al. Bringing carbon awareness to multi-cloud application delivery. In: Proc 2nd Workshop Sustainable Computer Systems; 2023 Jul 9. p. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3604930.3605711
Takci MT, Qadrdan M, Summers J, Gustafsson J. Data centres as a source of flexibility for power systems. Energy Rep. 2025; 13: 3661-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.03.020
Jain RK, Chiu DM, Hawe WR. A quantitative measure of fairness and discrimination. Hudson (MA): Digital Equipment Corporation, Eastern Research Laboratory; 1984 Sep 26.
Ware R, Mukerjee MK, Seshan S, Sherry J. Beyond Jain’s fairness index: setting the bar for the deployment of congestion control algorithms. In: Proc 18th ACM Workshop Hot Topics in Networks; 2019 Nov 14. p. 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365609.3365855
Zapletal A, Kuipers F. Slowdown as a metric for congestion control fairness. In: Proc 22nd ACM Workshop Hot Topics in Networks; 2023 Nov 28. p. 205-12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626111.3628185
Dehghanian SA, Heidary S, Shams D, Pour AM, Zahedi R. Deep learning for solar power forecasting: a robust stacked LSTM algorithm for operational applications. Edelweiss Appl Sci Technol. 2025; 9(10): 1591-600. https://doi.org/10.55214/2576-8484.v9i10.10722
Shehabi A, Smith S, Sartor D, Brown R, Herrlin M, Koomey J, et al. United States data center energy usage report. Berkeley (CA): Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; 2016.
Masanet E, Shehabi A, Lei N, Smith S, Koomey J. Recalibrating global data center energy-use estimates. Science. 2020 Feb; 367(6481): 984-6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba3758
Zhang J, Hodge BM, Florita A, Lu S, Hamann HF, Banunarayanan V. Metrics for evaluating the accuracy of solar power forecasting. Golden (CO): National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2013 Oct 1.
Yang D, Kleissl J. Solar irradiance and photovoltaic power forecasting. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2024 Feb 5. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003203971
Xie Y, Habte A, Sengupta M, Vignola F. An evaluation of the spectral irradiance data from the NSRDB. Golden (CO): National Renewable Energy Laboratory; NREL/TP-5D00-80439. Available from: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/80439.pdf
Tongsopit S, Junlakarn S, Chaianong A, Overland I, Vakulchuk R. Prosumer solar power and energy storage forecasting in countries with limited data: the case of Thailand. Heliyon. 2024; 10(2): e23997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e23997
Fleschutz M, Murphy MD. elmada: dynamic electricity carbon emission factors and prices for Europe. J Open Source Softw. 2021; 6(66): 3625. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03625
Hawkes AD. Estimating marginal CO₂ emissions rates for national electricity systems. Energy Policy. 2010; 38(10): 5977-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.053
Tranberg B, Corradi O, Lajoie B, Gibon T, Staffell I, Andresen GB. Real-time carbon accounting method for the European electricity markets. Energy Strategy Rev. 2019; 26: 100367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100367
Zhang S, Zhao W, Zhu B, Yan C, Song X, Jiang H, et al. A near-real-time daily European power consumption and carbon intensity dataset (ECON-PowerCI). Sci Data. 2025; 12(1): 1693. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05978-7
Scholta HF, Blaschke MJ. Temporal matching as an accounting principle for green electricity claims. Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1): 9280. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-65125-z
Lazic N, Boutilier C, Lu T, Wong E, Roy B, Ryu MK, et al. Data center cooling using model-predictive control. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2018); 2018 Dec 3–8; Montréal, Canada. Red Hook (NY): Curran Associates; 2018.
Goiri Í, Nguyen TD, Bianchini R. Coolair: temperature- and variation-aware management for free-cooled datacenters. ACM SIGPLAN Not. 2015; 50(4): 253-65. https://doi.org/10.1145/2775054.2694378

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Sahand Heidary, Seyed A. Dehghanian, Reza S. Aslani, Rahim Zahedi